TOEFL Writing Template
These templates can help you practice writing the integrated task in the TOEFL exam. But remember that this is just a template to give your writing structure. Please do not use the exact order and the exact words in this template. You are not supposed to use memorized phrases because using memorized phrases will bring your writing score down.
TOEFL Writing Template 1
Introduction:
The reading and lecture both discuss _____. The author of the article presents the argument that _____, while the lecturer challenges this view and argues that _____.
Body Paragraphs:
The reading states that _____. The article suggests that _____. However, the lecturer disagrees with this argument and claims that _____. Furthermore, he argues that _____.
Secondly, the article proposes that _____. The author notes that _____. In contrast, the lecturer asserts that _____. He elaborates by stating that _____.
Finally, the author presents the idea that _____. The article contends that _____. On the other hand, the lecturer’s position is that _____. He explains that _____.
No Conclusion.
TOEFL Writing Template 2
Introduction:
Both the reading and lecture address _____. The author of the article makes the case that _____, but the lecturer disputes this and argues instead that _____.
Body Paragraphs:
According to the reading, _____. The article asserts that _____. This viewpoint is challenged by the lecturer, who claims that _____. He also points out that _____.
In addition, the author suggests that _____. The article indicates that _____. However, the lecturer maintains that _____. He further argues that _____.
Lastly, the author advances the notion that _____. The article argues that _____. In opposition to this, the lecturer’s stance is that _____. He reasons that _____.
Conclusion: Not necessary.
TOEFL Writing Template 3
Introduction:
The topic of both the reading and lecture is _____. While the author of the article argues in favor of _____, the lecturer takes issue with this and contends that _____.
Body Paragraphs:
The reading posits that _____. The article claims that _____. This perspective is contradicted by the lecturer, who argues that _____. He also highlights that _____.
Furthermore, the author proposes that _____. The article notes that _____. In opposition to this, the lecturer asserts that _____. He adds that _____.
Conclusion: Not necessary.
TOEFL Writing Template 4
Introduction:
The subject of both the reading and lecture is _____. The author of the article puts forth the argument that _____, but this is disputed by the lecturer who argues instead for _____.
Body Paragraphs:
The reading suggests that ____. The article posits that ____. This viewpoint is challenged by the lecturer who contends ____. Additionally he points out ____.
Secondly, in contrast to ____, which is suggested by the author in their article. The lecturer maintains ____. He goes on to say ____.
Finally, while it is put forth in the article by its author ____, it is argued by the lecturer ____. He says ____.
Conclusion: Not necessary.
TOEFL Writing Template 5
Introduction:
The reading and lecture both explore ____. While it is argued in favor of _____ by its author in their article. This view is disputed by its counterpart in their lecture who instead argues for ______.
Body Paragraphs:
According to what was read in their article ____. It mentions ____. However this argument is challenged by its counterpart in their lecture who claims ____. Furthermore they point out ____.
Secondly it is suggested in their article by its author ____. They note ____. However it is asserted by its counterpart in their lecture ____. They go on to say ____.
Finally it is put forth as an idea in their article by its author ____, they contend ____. In contrast to this view it is argued by its counterpart in their lecture for ______. They say ______.
Conclusion: Not necessary.
The topic of both the reading and the lecture is about demotion of Pluto from the solar system. While the author of the article argues in favor of Pluto is not part of the solar system currently; the lecturer takes issue with this and contends that remove Pluto was the incorrect decition.
The reading posits that it was a valid choise because it was taked by thousands of people. The article claims that it was the best decision given that Pluto is smaller than moon. This perspective is contradicted by the lecturer, who argues that just 5000 people voted. He also highlights that an electronic vote could be an option to take into account more people opinions.
Furthermore, the author proposes that the future generations
The topic of both the reading and the lecture is about remotion of Pluto from the solar system. While the author of the article argues in favor of Pluto is not part of the solar system currently; the lecturer takes issue with this and contends that remove Pluto was the incorrect decition